COLUMN
The CEO is still the PM,
and the writer and the approver are the same person
More meetings, more explanation, more pages. Next month it comes back again with “a bit more explanation, please.” The cause is not the writing. It is that the approver and the writer are the same person. What you cut first is which one piece of the dual role to hand off.
Separate what to hand off from what to keep →No plan document, no sales deck
When the approver and the writer are the same person, the next cut never surfaces
The CEO or an executive is also the PM. The floor says “we don’t have enough people.” The plan gets thicker. Explanation is added. Meetings multiply. Next month, the same question comes back.
It looks like a writing problem. Structurally, it is this: when the approver and the writer are the same person, the next decision to cut never leaves that person’s head and reaches the meeting.
This article covers only one thing: which part of the dual role to hand off. Adding headcount and the amount of information in the plan are separate topics.
Three things that tend to happen while the CEO stays PM
| What happens on the ground | What stays in the plan |
|---|---|
| The CEO is final approver and also produces the material | Sends back their own writing. The number of lines cut never grows |
| Too busy, so more meetings are added | Explanation time grows. The single approver doesn’t change |
| “Let’s finish the plan first, then split roles” | “Finished” stays defined in the CEO’s head. The plan gets thicker |
The third one weighs the most. “Split roles once it’s done” locks the dual role in place. Without a unit to split first, you can fix the prose and still have next week’s meeting come back to the same question.
What to cut first: which piece of the dual role to hand off
This is not about changing everyone’s role overnight. In the next 30 days, hand off one of the following three.
- The writer: someone other than the approver produces the first draft. The CEO only decides “cut / keep.”
- The gatherer: interviews with the people who know last time’s history are owned by someone other than the approver. The CEO reads only the final line.
- The meeting chair: hand off facilitation of the explanation. The approval seat can stay with the CEO.
Where none of the three has been handed off, thickening the plan rarely stops the meeting returning to the same question. Where even one has, the number of times the same question returns next month often falls. Often — not always.
“There’s nobody in-house to hand it to” is a scope question, not a training question. Before any course, cut which piece of the dual role goes.
Passing at 30 days is not “fewer meetings”
The benchmark is that the next decision to cut can be identified outside the CEO’s head. If questions still come back as “a bit more explanation,” the writer and the approver are still the same person.
No plan document is needed. In a first conversation we start from which of the three roles has not yet been handed off.
Before separating the writer from the approver, don’t thicken the plan again.
Which of writing, gathering, or chairing is still in the CEO’s hands? That is where the conversation starts. That single line is the entry point to our Metamon diagnostic. No plan document needed. One line on the form (a team name is enough if you’re not sure).
Separate what to hand off from what to keep →
References
Related: For whom is a project plan a product?
Our service: Consulting services (CPP)
This article is a general framing, not legal, regulatory, or contractual advice. Decisions on renewals, budgets, and contracts follow your own internal rules.