COLUMN
When the floor says “we don’t have enough people,”
three things to check before adding an external PMO
Add a seat, and next month the same send-back can still be there. Look first at whether someone who knows last time is still around, whether there is a single final approver, and who will use this plan for what.
The decision to bring in an external PMO doesn’t start from headcount
Meetings multiply, the plan gets sent back, and the floor says “we don’t have enough people.” A seat is added. Someone new joins. Next month, the same send-back can still be there.
The criterion for an external PMO is not the number of empty seats. What to check first is whether last time’s history can be reached, whether there is a single approver, and whether you can say what the deliverable is for. Those aren’t the only cuts. But add headcount with these missing and the plan tends to get thicker, meetings longer, and the start later.
Three ways of bringing in an external PMO that don’t work
| Common approach | What is still there next month |
|---|---|
| Short on hands, so add one coordinator | Meeting admin grows. The number of decisions cut doesn’t |
| “Let’s bring them in first and define scope later” | Scope tends to widen every meeting. The plan keeps coming back |
| Nobody who knows last time’s history is left in-house | Fix the surface and “not enough people” tends to continue |
The third one tends to happen after a predecessor leaves. The new person writes correctly by the book, but why it stopped last time never reaches them. Improvement proposals made without that tend to get sent back.
The three conditions for an external PMO decision
Before the headcount conversation, cut just these three. If any can’t be answered, fill it in-house first. If it can’t be filled, ask outside for a “filler” role — which is a different request from “drive the project.”
- Can you reach last time’s history? Can someone who knows last time (last fiscal year) be asked directly? Are they still on the project?
- Is there a single approver? Is the final approver identified? If it is still a committee, send-backs tend to continue.
- Can you say what the deliverable is for? Who will use this plan (document), for what? Can you say “if this is achieved, it succeeded”?
If all three can be answered on the spot, the shortage leans toward hands. If not, it leans toward structure. Adding a person to a seat with structure missing tends to bring next week’s meeting back to the same question.
The common mix-up — unwinding a dual role vs. asking someone to drive
At companies where the CEO or an executive doubles as PM, an outside PMO is sometimes added because everyone is busy. But approval stays with the CEO, and last time’s history is scattered across the floor. The work that reaches the external PMO becomes “make the documents look nicer.”
Nice documents don’t move a plan if the approver can’t cut the next decision. Unwinding the dual role and asking someone to drive are separate conversations. What you cut first is which piece of the dual role to hand off.
What to settle in the first 30 days after bringing someone in
If you decide to bring someone in, passing at 30 days is not “fewer meetings.” The benchmark is that the next decision to cut can be identified inside the meeting. If questions aim at gaps in explanation, the scope or the reader is off.
Units — a team or a phase — where the conditions aren’t met are cut first. Don’t try to align the whole thing at once. This is the same pattern as a plan that keeps coming back with “a bit more explanation.”
Don’t decide next month’s seat while it’s still “we don’t have enough people.”
Is what’s missing hands, or an approver and last time’s history? That is where the conversation starts. That single line is the entry point to our Metamon diagnostic. No internal material needed. One line on the form (a team name is enough if you’re not sure).
Separate the three conditions before adding a seat →
References
Method: Consulting services (CPP)
Related: The CEO is still the PM: separate the writer from the approver
Related: Three things to hand an in-house PMO before training
This article is a general framing, not legal, regulatory, or contractual advice. Decisions on renewals, budgets, and contracts follow your own internal rules.